Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kulawik v. ERA Jet Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1991No. S-3045, S-3046Published

1ConcurrenceMatthews, Justice

I agree with the majority opinion in all respects. I write separately merely to state additional reasons in support of the conclusion that damages for loss of prospective inheritance are recoverable in cases where there are statutory beneficiaries.

When the territorial death act was enacted by Congress in 1900, it said nothing about how damages should be measured. It stated only that damages should be capped at $10,000 and directed how they should be distributed. If this statute had never been amended it would be difficult to argue that loss of inheritance damages were :not recoverable, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Tommy's Elbow Room, Inc. v. KavorkianAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Carter v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Osborne v. RussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. The Princess SophiaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API