Birmingham Television Corp. v. Water Works
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BLOODWORTH, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. The pleadings and depositions in support of the motion for summary judgment disclose that appellant-plaintiff Birmingham Television Corporation (bailor) stored for a consideration certain television equipment with appellees-defendants Harris Transfer Company, Harris Warehouse Company and Harris Transfer and Storage Company (bailees). On the reverse side of the warehouse receipts issued to appellant evidencing the bailment of this equipment there appeared the following:
PROPERTY WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THIS COMPANY FOR STORAGE ONLY…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galowitz v. MagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., of London v. RehmLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Kravitz v. Parking Service Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Beetson v. Hollywood Athletic ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kravitz v. Parking Service Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Butler v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Loveless v. GraddickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Powell v. Republic National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.