Legal Opinion

Angostura International Ltd. v. Melemed

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1998No. 0:98-cv-01006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Angostura International, Limited (“Angostura”), terminated its sales relationship with one of its long-term product vendors, Steven Melemed and his affiliated company. Angostura sues to resolve the parties’ rights resulting from the termination. Mr. Melemed seeks to arbitrate this matter under the provisions of the Minnesota Sales Representative Act, Minn.Stat. § 325E.37 (“MSRA”).

Angostura seeks partial summary judgment, or, alternatively, an injunction barring arbitration under the MSRA. The motion was argued on August 14,1998. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Whirlpool Corp. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hedding Sales & Service v. The Pneu Fast CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API