Uhlmann v. Brownell
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Simon Uhlmann and Frederic Uhlmann against Nathan Brown-ell, RosellaS. Brownell, S. Lavina Fuller, and Henry Morgan, to set aside a deed conveying land from Nathan Brownell to Fuller, and from Fuller to Rosella Brownell, and to set aside an assignment for creditors made by said Nathan Brownell to said Morgan as assignee; alleging that both instruments were fraudulent as to plaintiffs, who were creditors of Nathan Brownell.
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Simon Uhlmann and Frederic Uhlmann against Nathan Brown-ell, RosellaS. Brownell, S. Lavina Fuller, and Henry Morgan, to set aside a deed conveying land from Nathan Brownell to Fuller, and from Fuller to Rosella Brownell, and to set aside an assignment for creditors made by said Nathan Brownell to said Morgan as assignee; alleging that both instruments were fraudulent as to plaintiffs, who were creditors of Nathan Brownell. The referee dismissed the complaint on its merits, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The purpose of this action was two-fold: First, to set aside conveyances of the premises described in the complaint, made by the defendant Nathan Brownell to the defendant Fuller, and by the defendant Fuller to *700Mrs. Brownell, on the ground that they were fraudulent and void as to the creditors of the defendant Nathan Brownell; and, second, to have the general assignment for the benefit of creditors made by the defendant Nathan Brown-ell to the defendant Morgan adjudged fraudulent and void as to the plaintiffs. The actions were brought by the plaintiffs as judgment creditors of the firm of N.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Crane v. ShulerNew York Supreme Court · 1895