Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Madison v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1955No. 29,188Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion

Arterburn, J.

\I concur with Chief Justice Emmert in the granting of a new trial in this appeal on the ground the jury was erroneously instructed. I further concur with respect to all questions considered in his opinion except that of variance between the proof and the indictment. In my opinion, the variance is immaterial and I further think the error, if any, must be raised by an objection specifically pointed out to the trial court at the time it arises.

The indictment alleged that one, Trigg, was killed by *542the defendant with a hand grenade “loaded with nitroglycerine.”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gipe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Schuble v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API