Legal Opinion

Haley v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1909No. Appeal, No. 311PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 311, Jan. T., 1908, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1905, No. 4,063, on verdict for defendant in case of Rose Haley, Mary Coll and Fidelity Trust Company, Executors of the Last’ Will and Testament of Adam W. Louth, deceased, v. The American Agricultural Chemical Company. Assumpsit to recover cost of dredging a dock.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 311, Jan. T., 1908, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1905, No. 4,063, on verdict for defendant in case of Rose Haley, Mary Coll and Fidelity Trust Company, Executors of the Last’ Will and Testament of Adam W. Louth, deceased, v. The American Agricultural Chemical Company. Assumpsit to recover cost of dredging a dock. Before Au- DENRIED, J. The facts appear by the former report of the case in 217 Pa. 354. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed. Errors assigned were in the following form: The learned court below erred: 1. In not…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

Upon the trial of this case the court below gave binding instructions in favor of the defendant, and subsequently refused to enter judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of plaintiffs, but did enter judgment on the verdict in favor of the defendant.

Plaintiffs have appealed, and their counsel has specified error in what was apparently intended as three assignments, but the form in which they are stated is that of a single assignment, raising three separate questions, and this is a violation of rule 29. But if we overlook this, and consider the specifications as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. BilyeuSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Haley v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanick v. LeaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Irons v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Butler Boro. School District v. Penn Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Palmer v. General Flooring & Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. HarlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API