Woodman v. Lydiard-Peterson Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
In Equity. Suit by Prentiss M. Woodman against Lydiard-Peter-son Company. . The evidence was taken orally in court at the final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLARD, District Judge.
While it is not admitted in the. answer that the defendant copied the map of the complainant, yet the evidence in the case shows that that was done, and I understand that no contention to the contrary is now made by counsel for defendant. So we start with the fact found that, the complainant having a copyrighted map or publication, the defendant has made copies of it and used them. The question is whether, under these circumstances, the bill can be maintained.
[t] There is first the preliminary question raised by the defendant to the effect that no notice was given of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Osgood v. A. S. Aloe Instrument Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- General Drafting Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Andrews v. Guenther Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Pellegrini v. AllegriniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.