Legal Opinion

Cullum v. Packo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 21, 2006No. 1D06-766PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SILVERMAN, SCOTT J„ Associate Judge.

After a non-jury trial, the trial court found that appellees (hereinafter referred to as “Packo”) had not breached a non-compete agreement. The trial court also found that agreement nullified as a result of appellants’ (hereinafter referred to as “Cullum”) default on a companion lease. Cullum, the plaintiff below, appeals the trial court’s order, arguing that the court erred in respect to both the non-compete agreement and the lease. As we agree with Cullum in regard to the lease, we reverse the portion of the trial court’s order that found Cullum in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hough v. MensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. LeNeve v. via South Florida, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. American Lead Pencil Co. v. F. A. Wolfe & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. Brake v. STATE, UNEMP. APPEALS COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Waters v. Key Colony East, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. H. GREG LEE, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND CONSUL v. MARK CHMIELEWSKI AS COURT APPOINTED GUARDIAN FOR MATTHEW MARTINDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API