Legal Opinion

Allen v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2013No. 2011-SC-000009-MRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice MINTON.

After approving Ricky Allen’s request to represent himself in a jury trial of an indictment charging four felonies and a second-degree persistent felony offense (PFO 2), the trial court appointed standby counsel for Allen despite his objection. At trial, the court curtailed the range of Allen’s self-representation by barring him from all bench conferences, allowing only standby counsel to participate because the court determined Allen was a threat both to disrupt the trial and to flee. The trial resulted in a judgment of conviction and twenty-year…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. KammeraadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Henderson v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Mitchell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Keysor v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Lang v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API