Escareno v. Noltina Crucible & Refractory Corp.

ORDER

CARNES, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on plaintiffs Motion To Substitute [77], the case having been remanded by the Eleventh Circuit to allow plaintiffs counsel to file a second motion to substitute. Escareno v. Carl Nolte Söhne GmbH & Co., 77 F.3d 407 (11th Cir. 1996). Defendant has filed an opposition to plaintiffs motion [78] and plaintiff has filed a reply to that opposition [81].

I. Where We Are Now

When presented to the Court originally on counsel’s1 first motion to substitute himself as the party upon the death of his client, the plaintiff, the legal issues were…