Tender Years Learning Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Claim for Bid and Proposal Preparation Costs; Implied-In-Faet Contract; Rule 15(a)(2) Motion to Amend; Motion to Bifurcate; Motion to Dismiss; Mootness; Damages.
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff Tender Years Learning Corporation (“Tender Years”) originally brought this action as a bid protest challenging the Government’s decision to cancel a solicitation and to award an interim grant to the incumbent grantee. Tender Years’ original complaint sought to enjoin the Government’s cancel-ation of the solicitation and to restore the parties to their pre-cancelation negotiating posture, as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gulley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Mitchell Consulting Services Group Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Payne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018