Legal Opinion

Tender Years Learning Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 12, 2016No. 15-719CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claim for Bid and Proposal Preparation Costs; Implied-In-Faet Contract; Rule 15(a)(2) Motion to Amend; Motion to Bifurcate; Motion to Dismiss; Mootness; Damages.

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

Plaintiff Tender Years Learning Corporation (“Tender Years”) originally brought this action as a bid protest challenging the Government’s decision to cancel a solicitation and to award an interim grant to the incumbent grantee. Tender Years’ original complaint sought to enjoin the Government’s cancel-ation of the solicitation and to restore the parties to their pre-cancelation negotiating posture, as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gulley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  2. Mitchell Consulting Services Group Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Payne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API