Stroud Oil Reclaiming Co. v. Community State Bank of Bristow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice:
This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining demurrers filed by defendants Community State Bank of Bristow, Oklahoma (“Bank”), and the City of Bristow, Oklahoma (“Bristow”) to a petition initiating this action filed by plaintiff Quapaw Company, Inc. (“Quapaw”) and to a cross petition filed in the action by defendant Stroud Oil & Reclaiming Co. (“Stroud”).
Presented here for our determination is the question of whether mechanics and materialmen furnishing materials and services to a contractor doing work for a city under circumstances of the city not having required the giving…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lacy v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boren v. Thompson & AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Haskell Lemon Construction Co. v. Independent School District Number 12 of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Guy H. James Construction Co. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department Of TransportationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982