Legal Opinion

Innes v. Cosgrove

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

Heretofore the grand jury of Richmond county directed the district attorney of that county, pursuant to the provisions of section 742 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to file an information in the Court of Special Sessions charging Carl A. Richter, one of its own members, with a violation of sections 1782 and 1783 of the Penal Law. Those sections prohibit the disclosure of specified confidential matter relating to proceedings had before the grand jury. On July 25, 1941, the grand jury direction was approved by the county judge of Richmond county. The district attorney thereupon filed the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. People ex rel. Newton v. Special Term, Part 1, of Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Dodge v. Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Matter of Dodge v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. People v. TumenNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RichterNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1943
  2. Innes v. CosgroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API