Legal Opinion

Mathalia Motors, Inc. v. City of Oneida

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard A. Zeller, J.

Petitioner Mathalia Motors, Inc. seeks a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 annulling the award of a towing contract by respondent City of Oneida to Vic Novell Motors, Inc.

On July 18, 1980 respondent City of Oneida (the City) advertised in the Oneida Daily Dispatch for towing services. Petitioner Mathalia Motors, Inc. (Mathalia) and Vic Novell Motors, Inc. (Novell) were the only bidders. Mathalia alleges that despite the fact that its bid was lower than the bid of Novell, the contract was awarded to Novell. Mathalia also alleges that Novell’s bid did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Smith v. FlaggNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Kayfield Construction Corp. v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Doyle Alarm Co. v. RevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Creole Enterprises Inc. v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Creole Enterprises, Inc. v. GiulianiNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Westchester Builders Supply, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API