Lembeck v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
We think that the plaintiff’s proof comes to nothing more than that the defendant paid the crew. The pay roll and the documents covering the coal did not emanate from the defendant, nor were they sent to it, so far as appears. Taken alone, the payment of the erew might be enough to establish prima facie that the defendant operated the ship, though that question we do not find it necessary to decide. It becomes of no moment in the light of the resolution of the board, which shows the contrary. While the board vested “supervision” of all ships of the “Lines” in its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. PerchemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- United States v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Meehan v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Breitmayer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Cohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hicks v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- (PS) King v. TarverDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Brooke v. PatelDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Disability Rights Washington v. MenesesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Gastelum v. TC Heritage Inn 2 of Bakersfield LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.