Legal Opinion

Goewey v. Sanborn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract in writing made by the defendant with the assignors of the plaintiff. Two writings are set forth in the declaration. They appear to constitute a single contract so far as the issues here raised are concerned and will be treated accordingly. The facts alleged respecting them, so far as here material, are that in New York, on March 23, 1927, the plaintiff’s assignors offered in writing to purchase from the defendant the entire capital stock of the Hudson Operating Company and the entire capital stock of the Flanders…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Pesce v. BrecherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Broadway National Bank v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Lee v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. McNulty v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API