Jones v. Maine Central Railroad
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
The twenty-seven plaintiffs in this action seek recovery under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. (hereinafter FELA), for hearing loss injuries allegedly caused by various negligent acts or omissions of Defendants. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the claims of twenty-one plaintiffs on the grounds that they are time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Section 56 of Title 45, United States Code, provides that “[n]o action shall be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dale R. Kichline v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Kathleen Dubose v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Danny P. Emmons v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ranney v. Parawax Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Billman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- McCoy v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Depczynski v. Adsco/Farrar & TreftsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Courtney v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.