Legal Opinion

Jones v. Maine Central Railroad

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 26, 1988No. Civ. 87-0224-PPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GENE CARTER, District Judge.

The twenty-seven plaintiffs in this action seek recovery under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. (hereinafter FELA), for hearing loss injuries allegedly caused by various negligent acts or omissions of Defendants. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the claims of twenty-one plaintiffs on the grounds that they are time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Section 56 of Title 45, United States Code, provides that “[n]o action shall be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Dale R. Kichline v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Kathleen Dubose v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Danny P. Emmons v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ranney v. Parawax Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Billman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. McCoy v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Depczynski v. Adsco/Farrar & TreftsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Courtney v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API