Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Montiel

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 19, 1977No. CM 434338Published

1DissentCook, Senior Judge

I disagree with my brethren and would order a rehearing in this case for the reasons I have previously expressed in United States v. Jones, 3 M.J. 869 (A.C.M.R. 12 July 1977). Additionally, I take this opportunity to comment on an unseemly practice which occurred in this and other cases we have had occasion to recently review. The appellant in this case was represented at trial by a civilian defense counsel and yet the post-trial Goode** review was accomplished by the regularly appointed defense counsel. While appellate courts may indulge all manner of theories to arrive at a conclusion that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API