Legal Opinion

Long Island Railroad v. Keystone Iron & Metal Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 15, 1924No. 3795Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.,

This matter grows out of a rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defence. The defence set up in the affidavit is two-fold: First, the defendant avers that he was acting only as agent for the S. O. Bell Sales Corporation, Woolworth Building, New York City, for the purchase of the wooden boxes involved, and that, therefore, there can be no liability; and the second defence offered is that the demurrage, storage and other expenses are unreasonable and improper charges.

It is horn-book law that in assumpsit, if the defendant discloses that he is only acting as agent for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DettlebachSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Beymer v. BonsallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  4. West Jersey & Seashore R. R. v. Whiting Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API