People v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence connecting defendant to his crimes was circumstantial. There was a midnight break-in at a dry cleaners and clothes in cleaner bags were taken. Defendant was apprehended shortly thereafter two blocks from the cleaners with the clothes still in their cleaner bags. Defendant offered several false explanations to account for his possession. It has been long settled that under circumstances similar to those in the instant case recent possession of goods is sufficient to convict for burglary (Knickerbocker v People, 43 NY 177). Falsely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. CleagueNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Knickerbocker v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BergersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. PasciutaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. MeasheawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. MasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985