Legal Opinion

State v. Hidalgo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1929No. 29522PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOveeton, J.

Hidalgo and Trotter were jointly informed against for robbery. Hidalgo was tried alone, and his codefendant, Trotter, was a witness against him. Hidalgo was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary, and now prosecutes the present appeal.

After Hidalgo had closed his case, the state placed. Walter Bertrand on the stand in rebuttal, and asked him whether on the night of the omnibus robbery, which was the robbery in question, he saw Hidalgo and Trotter together. This question was objected to on the ground that the evidence sought to be elicited was not rebuttal evidence, but should have been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. State v. BellardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. IseringhausenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. State v. SlimanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API