Legal Opinion

Taylor Engineering, Inc. and Robert J. Wagner, P.E. v. Dickerson Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D15-4782PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinokur, J.

Appellants (collectively “Taylor”) filed a post-trial motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 768.79(1), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. The trial court denied the motion on the authority of Borden Dairy Co. of Alabama, LLC v. Kuhajda, 171 So.3d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (holding that a proposal for settlement must strictly comply with the content requirements of rule 1.442(c)(2) in order to entitle the movant to attorneys’ fees and costs). Taylor appealed. However, while this appeal was pending, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our decision in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Rule 9.331, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Susanne L. Kuhajda v. Borden Dairy Company of Alabama, LLC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Peoples Gas System v. Acme Gas Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Demeko Ladjuan Sims v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Zendejas v. RedmanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
  3. BAM Trading Services, Inc., D/B/A Binance.US v. State of Florida, Office of Financial RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. CITY OF MIAMI v. CHARLES J. BENCOMO AND STACY BENCOMODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  5. Curtis Parker v. Florida Dept. of Corr.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API