Legal Opinion

Burt v. Brewers & Maltsters' Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1876Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon a nonsuit directed at the Circuit, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made at the Special Term upon a case and exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Taloott, J.:

This is an action on a policy of marine insurance, underwritten by the three companies named in the title. The plaintiff was non-suited on the trial at the Oswego Circuit, and a motion for a new trial was afterwards denied at the Special Term, and this appeal is from the judgment and order denying a new trial.

The insurance was limited by a memorandum, in manuscript, written across the margin of the policy in the following words: “Against actual total loss only.” This restriction was ignored by the complaint, which proceeded upon the theory of a oonstruotive total loss. It was,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maggrath v. ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1803
  2. Wadsworth v. Pacific InsuranceCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  3. Wallerstein v. . the Columbian Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Buchanan v. Ocean Insurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. Leeds v. . the Mechanics' Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API