Ordway v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiff-appellant makes three points in support of his contention that he has a cause of action which he can still assert:(1) At the time of the payment of the tax' sought to be recovered, original section 3228 of the Revised Statutes was in force. That section allowed two years after a cause of action accrued to the taxpayer within which to present his claim to the Commissioner, and the act of 1926 (44 Stat. 115; 26 USCA § 157, note), requiring that the claim be presented “within four years next after the payment of such tax,” did not operate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- McDonald Coal Co. v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
- United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogan v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. FrauenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Aladdin Co. v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930
- Braun v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- Leach v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930