Legal Opinion

Ordway v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1930No. 120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiff-appellant makes three points in support of his contention that he has a cause of action which he can still assert:(1) At the time of the payment of the tax' sought to be recovered, original section 3228 of the Revised Statutes was in force. That section allowed two years after a cause of action accrued to the taxpayer within which to present his claim to the Commissioner, and the act of 1926 (44 Stat. 115; 26 USCA § 157, note), requiring that the claim be presented “within four years next after the payment of such tax,” did not operate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. McDonald Coal Co. v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogan v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. FrauenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Aladdin Co. v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930
  4. Braun v. LewellynDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Leach v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API