Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
MORENO, J., Concurring.
I agree with the majority that the trial court improperly enjoined Medtronic, Inc., from pursuing its action in Minnesota. The majority concludes that the trial court’s temporary restraining order (TRO) was improper under notions of judicial restraint and comity. I write separately to explain why I believe these notions of judicial restraint and comity should apply in this case and also to discuss, more generally, what I consider to be the appropriate criteria for issuing antisuit injunctions.
The majority recognizes California’s interest in protecting employees from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- General Electric Company v. Deutz AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Gannon v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.