Legal Opinion
VROOM, INC. v. SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 28, 2022No. 2:21-cv-06737Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VROOM INC.; VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC d/b/a VROOM, d/b/a TEXAS DIRECT AUTO; CARSTORY, LLC; and Case No.: 2:21-cv-06737-WJM-JSA VAST.COM, INC. d/b/a CARSTORY, OPINION Plaintiffs, v. SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Defendant. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiffs Vroom, Inc., Vroom Automotive, LLC d/b/a Texas Direct Auto, CarStory, LLC, and Vast.com, Inc. d/b/a CarStory (collectively, “Vroom” or “Plaintiffs”) brought this declaratory judgment action against defendant Sidekick Technology, LLC (“Sidekick” or “Defendant”) seeking a declaration…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.