Legal Opinion

SERNA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1992No. ID 3188PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3188 MATTER OF SERNA In Deportation Proceedings A-26757902 Decided by Board October 14, 1992 (I) Neither the seriousness of a criminal offense nor the severity of the sentence imposed therefor is determinative of whether a crime involves moral turpitude. (2) A conviction under

18 U.S.C. § 1546

(1982) for possession of an altered immigration document with knowledge that it was altered, but without its use or proof of any intent to use it unlawfully, is not a conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude. CHARGE: Order. Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(1) [

8 U.S.C. § 1251

(aX1))—Excluda…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
  5. Percy Briggs Wadman v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Jean Patrick Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Jan Knapik v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Omagah v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. AJAMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API