Legal Opinion

BE & K, INC. v. Seminole Kraft Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1991No. 90-3578PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

583 So.2d 361 (1991)

BE & K, INC., Appellant,

v.

SEMINOLE KRAFT CORP. and Robert and Effie Bricker, Appellees.

No. 90-3578.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 1991.

Karen K. Cole, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Frank W. Hession, of Matthews & Hession, Jacksonville, for appellees.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

ZEHMER, Judge.

In this proceeding, BE & K, Inc., seeks appellate review of a non-final order granting Seminole Kraft Corporation a partial summary judgment on its third-party claim for indemnification pursuant to a contractual provision made between BE & K…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. BrunsSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Simpson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Rhein v. RheinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Sunshine Dodge, Inc. v. KetchemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. QuernsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jenne v. MarantoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Cotton States Mut. Ins. v. D'ALTODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Canal Ins. Co. v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Slade v. FEDERATED NAT. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Okeelanta Corp. v. McDonaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API