Legal Opinion
Noble v. Adams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2011No. 09-17251PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
With the filing of the Amended Opinion, Pro Se Appellee’s petition for rehearing filed April 8, 2011, is hereby DENIED, no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Adams and Cuevas are prison officials responsible for a post-riot lockdown of Corcoran State Prison in California. They appeal the district court’s denial of their assertion of qualified immunity against inmate Noble’s claim that the lockdown resulted in a denial of his Eighth Amendment right to outdoor exercise. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal, and we reverse and remand with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Johnny L. Spain v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Palmigiano v. GarrahyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maurice Olivier v. Leroy BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Hernandez v. CateDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Neil Grenning v. Maggie Miller-StoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- (PC) Witkin v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Alex Smith v. CoreCivic, et al.District Court, D. Montana · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.