Legal Opinion

Geo Exchange Systems, LLC v. Cam

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 14, 2003No. 27587-2-IIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

65 P.3d 11 (2003)

115 Wash.App. 625

GEO EXCHANGE SYSTEMS, LLC and Total Energy Concepts, Inc., Appellants,

v.

Pirfil CAM and Elena Cam, Respondents.

No. 27587-2-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 14, 2003.

Michael B. King, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, David C. Spellman, Charles J. Pruitt, Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky LLP., Portland, OR, for Appellants.

James S. Smith, Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, for Respondent.

PART PUBLISHED OPINION[*]

HUNT, C.J.

Geo Exchange Systems, LLC (GES) and Total Energy Concepts, Inc. (TECI) appeal the trial court's reduction of a private construction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Curtis Lumber Co. v. SortorWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Nghiem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. W.R.P. Lake Union Ltd. Partnership v. Exterior Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Farwest Steel Corp. v. Mainline Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API