Legal Opinion
Rohrlack v. Goff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 2279-60PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, Judge.
This is a motion by third-party defendant Taylor, a policeman, to dismiss as to him the third-party complaint heretofore filed in this action. Whether dis*671missal should be ordered depends on. whether the “District of Columbia Employee Non-Liability Act”1 applies to this suit, if so, whether that Act as so applied violates the due process clause of the Constitution, and finally, whether declaration that the Act as so applied is constitutional-may be made without empaneling a three-judge court.2
For the purposes of this motion the following facts are conceded by the parties: On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Speert v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Robert E. Wyngaard v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donahue v. District of Columbia Board of PsychologyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Barrick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961