Trainor v. GRIEDER

OPINION

Justice ROBINSON

for the Court.

The defendant, Paul Grieder, appeals from the entry of three orders of the Superior Court. 1 On appeal, the defendant contends (1) that the “Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over [the defendant]” because there was no “return of an unsatisfied execution;” (2) that “void jurisdiction procured by void process cannot be waived;” and (3) that the defendant “has already been unlawfully incarcerated/imprisoned” in violation of his state and federal constitutional rights.

This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an…