Legal Opinion

Herman v. Leland

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint and motion by plaintiff for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This action came on for trial before the court and a jury at the April term, 1913. At the close of the entire case the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prove a cause of action. The motion was granted. Thereupon plaintiff moved for a new trial upon all the grounds specified in section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which motion was entertained by the court. It appears from the facts herein, as claimed by the plaintiff, that in and about the year 1908 the plaintiff, at the defendant’s request and as defendant’s agent, loaned to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Howe v. . Buffalo, N.Y. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Hale v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Brown v. Mechanics & Traders' BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herman v. LelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API