Crenshaw v. Duff's Exr.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 110 — Action by J'. G-. Crenshaw against Edmund Duff’s Executor to Recover Usury Alleged to Have Been Paid. appeal from barren circuit court. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals.
Read the full summary
Case 110 — Action by J'. G-. Crenshaw against Edmund Duff’s Executor to Recover Usury Alleged to Have Been Paid. appeal from barren circuit court. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals. This suit was brought by appellant, J. G. Crenshaw against George T. Duff, executor of Edmund Duff, deceased, and H. A. Crenshaw, to recover from said executor $282.40, claimed to be due as balance on a note executed by appellant and H. A. Crenshaw to decedent, and which amount, appellant alleges, was usurious interest wrongfully and knowingly collected hy appellee. This money $282.40 was paid by…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
JUDGE O’RBAR
Reversing.
Appellant, -J. G. Crenshaw, and his brother, H. A. Cren*914shaw, executed their joint note to Edmund Duff on the 2Gth of January, 18G9, for $1,1-15.73, stipulating for the payment of interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum. It is alleged that appellant .and H. A. Crenshaw made various payments on that note until its renewal on the 19th of January, 1880. In the renewal the old note was surrendered,, and a new note executed, bearing six per cent, per annum from date until paid. During the year 1882,the obligee, Edmund Duff, died testate,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. Cornwall & Bro.'s AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Kendall v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Ellis v. Brannin's ex'orsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
- Proctor v. TerrillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
3Cited by3 opinions
- Batson v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
- Lay v. LayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Batson v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998