Legal Opinion

Murray v. Ware's administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 26, 1809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

judge BIBB.

The administrator declared in assumpsit, 1st. for goods, wares and merchandize sold and delivered at a certain price; 2d1y. for work anti labor performed, to the amount of a sum certain; 3dly. upon a quantum meru~t for services rendered by the intestate as a storekeeper and clerk. On the trial of the issues two bills of exception were taken by Murray, the appellant, out of which the questions now presented for consideration arise. It appears that the evidence in support of the action applied only to the third count: that the witness on behalf of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams Express Co. v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  2. Clarke v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rockcastle County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API