State v. Valentine
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
This appeal presents an undisputed error for the disposition of this court. The trial court accepted defendant’s admission of certain probation violations without first ascertaining defendant’s understanding of his rights to cross examine adverse witnesses and present his own and his desire to forego those rights. The state acknowledges that the trial court violated the express requirements of Rule 27.8, 17 A.R.S. Rules of Criminal Procedure. 1 Whether the error was fundamental and reversible is the issue of this appeal. We hold that it was.
Defendant was placed on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. BarnettArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CoonArizona Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hersch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- State v. GladCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987