Legal Opinion
City Of Seattle, Apps. v. Keith Holmquist, Et Ano., Resps.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 30, 2014No. 70500-8Published
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KEITH L. HOLMQUIST and KAY BURDINE HOLMQUIST, f/k/a KAY DIVISION ONE BURDINE, husband and wife; and FREDERICK A. KASEBURG, a No. 70500-8-1 single man, (Consol. with No. 70504-1-1) Respondents, PUBLISHED OPINION r-o * -- ". CD jr- •>•> - _ j •' C__ KING COUNTY, a political subdivision p-j ~ 35 o- of the State of Washington; and CO ' '-r CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal o ^;-~ corporation, J». c-Or .-&> :~-~-^L <s Appellants. FILED: June 30, 2014 "* -..j _ en o — Dwyer, J. — In 1926, two individuals signed real estate installment contracts, a form…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Cascade Security Bank v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.