Legal Opinion

East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sought leave to amend the complaint to add allegations against the defendant Victor Canseco so as to impose personal liability against him under a theory of piercing the corporate veil. “In the absence of significant prejudice or surprise to the opposing party, leave to amend a pleading should be freely given, unless the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit” (Russo v Lapeer Contr. Co., Inc., 84 AD3d 1344 [2011] [citations omitted]; see CPLR 3025 [b]). “A [party] seeking to pierce the corporate veil must demonstrate that a court in equity should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Superior Transcribing Service, LLC v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Russo v. Lapeer Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Town of Southampton v. ChiodiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Americore Drilling & Cutting, Inc. v. EMB Contr. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Kyung Hee Moon v. OwadeyahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API