East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff sought leave to amend the complaint to add allegations against the defendant Victor Canseco so as to impose personal liability against him under a theory of piercing the corporate veil. “In the absence of significant prejudice or surprise to the opposing party, leave to amend a pleading should be freely given, unless the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit” (Russo v Lapeer Contr. Co., Inc., 84 AD3d 1344 [2011] [citations omitted]; see CPLR 3025 [b]). “A [party] seeking to pierce the corporate veil must demonstrate that a court in equity should…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Superior Transcribing Service, LLC v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Russo v. Lapeer Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Town of Southampton v. ChiodiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Americore Drilling & Cutting, Inc. v. EMB Contr. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Kyung Hee Moon v. OwadeyahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024