Legal Opinion
Bakus v. Broward County
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 22, 1993No. 91-3357PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON AMENDED MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
2Per curiam
We grant appellants’ amended motion for rehearing and clarification and deny then-motion for rehearing en bane. In our earlier decision, 615 So.2d 166, we affirmed without opinion the trial court’s order finding appellants failed to establish either a permanent or temporary taking of their properties. Given this court’s recent decisions in Test v. Broward County, 616 So.2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) and Broward County v. Ellington, 622 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), we write to clarify our earlier decision.
Appella…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Canal Authority v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
- City of Jacksonville v. GriffinSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- DIV. OF ADMIN., STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. West Palm Beach Garden ClubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Fields v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Perez v. Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002