Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Richard v. Cuyahoga County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2000No. 99-2250PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

We dismiss Richard’s appeal. Richard did not file a timely appeal from the February 28, 1995 court of appeals judgment revoking his in forma pauperis status for the future filing of original actions in that court. See S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1).

Richard’s Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment did not extend the time for him to appeal the 1995 judgment. “A Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment cannot be used as a substitute for a timely appeal or as a means to extend the time for perfecting an appeal from the original judgment.” Key v. Mitchell (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 89, 90-91, 689…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Key v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Durkin v. UngaroOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brunner Firm Co. v. Bussard, 07ap-867 (9-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Richard v. Cuyahoga Cty. Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Citizen of Hocking Cty. v. Ohio Power Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. A.D. Transport Express, Inc. v. Lloyds Towing Serv. & Sales, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API