Legal Opinion
National Arbitration & Mediation v. Feinstein & Nisnewitz, P.C.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 25, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs, and defendant’s motion to consolidate this action with an action pending in the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entitled Feinstein & Nisnewitz, P.C. v DeCofin, LLC (index No. CV-025896-11/QU) is denied.
Plaintiff National Arbitration & Mediation (NAM) was engaged to mediate the case of Luca Ricci and DeCofin, LLC against Soma Designers, LLC. Ricci and DeCofin were represented at that mediation by defendant Feinstein & Nisnewitz, EC. (FNFC). In connection with the mediation, Craig Nisnewitz,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sokolow, Dunaud, Mercadier & Carreras LLP v. LacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Viafax Corp. v. Citicorp Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. v. SharrocksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Spector v. ZuckermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Abrams v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.