Mann v. Mann

Contrary to the plaintiff husband’s contentions, former section 699.11 of this court’s rules was expressly applicable to motions for "Alimony, Counsel Fee Pendente Lite and Child Support” (see, 22 NYCRR former 699.11 [a], [b], now 202.16 [g]; cf. Patell v Patell, 91 AD2d 1028; Lewin v Lewin, 91 AD2d 649). At bar, the court’s award of support and counsel fees was not the product of motion practice, but was rather a determination rendered after a full trial on the issue of the parties’ respective financial positions. Accordingly, the failure of the parties to submit affidavits of net worth, as…