Legal Opinion

In re Greenspun

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1958No. 4112Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an original petition in habeas corpus for the petitioner’s discharge from confinement. His confinement is upon a charge of the crime commonly known as blackmail. He contends that his commitment is without reasonable or probable cause.

Following preliminary hearing before the justice of the peace of Austin township, Lander County, petitioner was ordered held to answer to the Third judicial district court upon a finding of probable cause to believe him guilty of the crime charged. Our question is whether the evidence presented by the State at the preliminary hearing may be said to…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  2. Ex Parte EsdenNevada Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API