Legal Opinion
Roederer ex rel. FlowJo, LLC v. Treister
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 5, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-cv-01021-CLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MARK D. CLARKE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). The Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion as specified in this Order and enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d):
FINDINGS OF FACT1
The Parties
1. Mario Roederer, Ph.D., is an individual and citizen of Bethesda, MD.
2. Adam Treister is an individual and citizen of Ashland, Oregon.
3. FlowJo, LLC…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- WPIX, Inc. v. Ivi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Textile Unlimited, Inc., a California Corporation v. A..bmhand Company, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aman Poya v. Kristi Noem et alDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- D.T. v. NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- The Research Foundation for the State University of New York v. Inpria CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- University Accounting Service, LLC v. SchultonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020