Legal Opinion

Bradley Kelton Crenshaw v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided February 27, 2014No. 02-08-00304-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BILL MEIER, Justice.

I. Introduction

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals remanded this case to us. See Crenshaw v. State, 378 S.W.3d 460, 462 (Tex.Crim.App.2012). In two points, appellant Bradley Kelton Crenshaw argues that his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI) should be reversed because the State violated his due process rights by “expanding the scope of the prosecution beyond that noticed to the defense in the charging instrument.” We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.

II. Background

The State charged Crenshaw by information, alleging that he operated a motor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Crenshaw, Bradley KeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. State v. BarbernellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Wiley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cordrecus Dunque Burton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Edward Cornell Knight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Daniel Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016
  4. Gonzalez, Enrique Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Mario Ernesto Martell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API