Legal Opinion

Ball v. Hopkins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The testator devised and bequeathed the residue of his estate to the petitioners in trust to manage, control and invest, and to pay his wife if she survived him the income during her life. If, however, the income proved inadequate and insufficient for her personal enjoyment, comfort and maintenance, they were to pay her such part of the principal as she might in her judgment require for the purposes stated. By the second clause the testator directed that upon the death of his wife the trustees as soon as convenient and without detriment to his estate were to divide one third thereof among his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Cushman v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Ball v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Sherburne v. HowlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Crowell v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Gilman v. Congregational Home Missionary SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Hendrick v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API