Dama v. Bay Bank & Trust Co.

Appellant, J. Frank Dama, challenges a judgment granting a mandatory permanent injunction requiring the removal of a sign he erected. Appellant raises a number of issues, and we find one has merit: the trial court erred in granting a mandatory permanent injunction based on its finding that the placement of the sign is inconsistent with appellee’s purported easement. We, therefore, reverse and direct entry of a final judgment in favor of appellant.

On September 3, 2009, appellee, Bay Bank & Trust (Bank), filed an amended complaint against appellant, owner of the main parcel of the shopping…