Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1915No. L.A. No. 3978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County settling the account of the administrator of the estate of a deceased person. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

At the close of the argument, Shaw, J., delivered the opinion of the court, Sloss, J., and Lawlor, J., concurring.

The decedent Moore died, according to the evidence, on February 4, 1910. His widow was appointed administratrix of his estate and qualified and continued to act as administratrix until February 23,1912, when she resigned. She remarried a Mr. Fraser on October 9, 1911, and after that marriage, but on the same day, she applied for the order in controversy here for the payment of an allowance out of the estate of Mioore for her support during the period of her widowhood, that is for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bacon v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wiedemann v. WiedemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Estate of MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. In Re Brooks Estate. Jenson v. Ogden State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Kessler v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API