Legal Opinion

Miele v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

Petitioners are letterers and sign painters employed by the City of New York. In consolidated proceedings in pursuance of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, they here seek to review determinations of the city comptroller holding they are not entitled to the benefit of a statutory direction *409that the wages of workmen on ‘ ‘ public work ’ ’ shall be not less than the “ prevailing rate of wages ” for the “ same trade or occupation ” in the locality. This statutory direction is found in subdivision 3 of section 220 of the Labor Law.

The work in question involves the painting or lettering of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pinkwater v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Dinan v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. De La Cruz v. Caddell Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Sewer Environmental Contractors, Inc. v. GoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Long Island Lighting Co. v. Industrial CommissionerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API