State v. Sliger
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Chief Justice.
Paul B. Sliger and Patricia L. Broussard were charged with having possessed a controlled dangerous substance, to-wit, marijuana, with intent to distribute. Defendants’ motion to quash the bill was sustained and the State is appealing from that ruling.
The charge is brought under the provisions of Act 457 of 1970 (R.S. 40:961, et seq.)
Two reasons were urged in support of the motion to quash. The first was that the authority granted to the Board -of Health of the State is so broad that it is violative “of the defendants’ constitutional rights, in that it does not afford…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ricks v. Department of State Civil ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Peck v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- State v. WelknerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Southern Hide Co. v. BestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Louisiana Independent Auto Dealers Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- State v. VailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Wiley v. Missouri Pacific R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- State v. KibodeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Doherty v. Calcasieu Parish School Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.